Yes, it's his fault
The prosecution's case: Internet restricted after fighting breaks out in Ethiopia's Tigray region
The extreme prosecution of the sourced event.
Case 373E7B36324E48390839 · 2026-09-25
The Trump Jury
Internet restricted after fighting breaks out in Ethiopia's Tigray region
Read both sides. Cast your verdict. Predict the crowd.
- 1 Case
- 2 Verdict
- 3 Prediction
- 4 Results
Step 1
Read the case
Neutral facts
BBC News headline: Internet restricted after fighting breaks out in Ethiopia's Tigray region During the two-year civil war in Tigray, the region was totally cut off from the outside world. This paragraph is an excerpt/paraphrase of the linked original. It is not an unsourced AI claim.
What the record shows: The record is the linked original report. This site does not add unsourced facts.
ProsecutionSatire
The prosecution's case: Internet restricted after fighting breaks out in Ethiopia's Tigray region
The extreme prosecution of the sourced event.
Read the full prosecution
DefenseSatire
The defense's case: Internet restricted after fighting breaks out in Ethiopia's Tigray region
The extreme defense of the sourced event.
Read the full defense
The Result
The defense submits that the recent internet restrictions in Ethiopia's Tigray region are a necessary measure in response to escalating violence. Supporters might argue that such actions are vital for maintaining order during a turbulent time.
What Trump Did
The defense might suggest that while the situation is dire, it is not a reflection of any one leader's policies but rather a complex regional issue. The defense admits that the internet restrictions are unfortunate but necessary for security.
Why Supporters Credit Him
Supporters might argue that the swift response to violence is indicative of strong leadership. The defense might argue that maintaining stability in such regions is crucial for preventing further escalation.
The Supporting Record
The defense submits that history shows that communication blackouts can sometimes prevent the spread of misinformation that could incite further violence. The defense might suggest that this is a tactical decision made in the interest of public safety.
The Limitation or Competing Explanation
However, the defense might argue that while these measures are controversial, they are not unique to Ethiopia and have been employed in various contexts worldwide.
Verdict
If this is Trump's fault, his supporters will gladly let him take the blame.
Defense exhibits
- Supporters' theory: Internet restrictions maintain order during violence.
- Supporters' theory: Strong leadership is necessary in crises.
- Supporters' theory: Communication blackouts can prevent misinformation.
- Supporters' theory: Tactical decisions prioritize public safety.
Reality Check
During the two-year civil war in Tigray, the region was totally cut off from the outside world.
Satirical commentary based on the sourced facts above. Not a news report, campaign, or endorsement.
Connecting to the jury room…
Final verdict announced: September 26, 2026 at 10:01 AM ET
Step 2 · Personal verdict
Your verdict
Cast your verdict in VOTE HERE above. Then predict the jury here.
No account required. One active verdict per browser; you can change it while voting is open.
Step 3 · Crowd prediction
Predict the jury
When this case closes, what percentage of readers will say “Trump’s fault”?
Step 4 · Reader verdict
The jury so far
0 verified votes
Yes, it's his fault0%
No, it's not his fault0%
Too soon to tell0%
- Your verdict
- —
- Your prediction
- —
Only 0 points away
100Accuracy score
Results are based on participating site visitors and are not a scientific poll.
Voting closed
Step 5 · Challenge your friends
Can you beat my prediction?
Your jury record
This browser
- Cases judged
- 0
- Average accuracy
- —
- Current streak
- 0
Opening Argument
The prosecution argues that the recent internet restrictions in Ethiopia's Tigray region are a direct consequence of the chaos that has been allowed to fester under the previous administration, which has ties to Trump. The prosecution alleges that this is not merely a local issue but a reflection of a broader pattern of neglect that can be traced back to Trump's policies.
Exhibit A: The Plausible Link
The prosecution submits that the civil war in Tigray, which has led to the region being cut off from the outside world, is a direct result of the divisive rhetoric that Trump has championed. The prosecution imagines that this rhetoric has emboldened authoritarian regimes worldwide, leading to increased violence and instability.
The Domino Effect
In the prosecution's theory, the internet restrictions are just the beginning.
The Hidden Danger
The prosecution urges that the consequences of these actions are dire. The prosecution admits that the lack of information flow could lead to misinformation and further violence, all while Trump remains blissfully unaware of the chaos his influence has wrought.
Closing Argument
In this fictional case, the prosecution argues that the internet restrictions are a symptom of a much larger problem, one that traces back to the very top of the political hierarchy.
Verdict
The prosecution alleges: The prosecution believes that the evidence clearly points to a negligence that has global repercussions, all stemming from a failure of leadership linked to Trump.
Prosecution exhibits
Reality Check
During the two-year civil war in Tigray, the region was totally cut off from the outside world.