Yes, it's Trump's fault
The prosecution's case: Where voters stand on state ballot measures, from abortion to LGBTQ rights to guns
The extreme prosecution of the sourced event.
Case 8FD18607BC6D08404B2E · 2026-11-04
The Trump Jury
Where voters stand on state ballot measures, from abortion to LGBTQ rights to guns
Read both sides. Cast your verdict. Predict the crowd.
- 1 Case
- 2 Verdict
- 3 Prediction
- 4 Results
Step 1
Read the case
Neutral facts
Voters in dozens of states considered 146 statewide ballot measures this midterm cycle.
What the record shows: Voters considered various statewide ballot measures.
ProsecutionSatire
The prosecution's case: Where voters stand on state ballot measures, from abortion to LGBTQ rights to guns
The extreme prosecution of the sourced event.
Read the full prosecution
DefenseSatire
The defense's case: Where voters stand on state ballot measures, from abortion to LGBTQ rights to guns
The extreme defense of the sourced event.
Read the full defense
The Result
Supporters might argue that the recent midterm elections, where voters considered 146 statewide ballot measures, showcase a vibrant democracy in action. The defense submits that these measures reflect the diverse values and priorities of the American electorate, highlighting a commitment to addressing pressing social issues.
What Trump Did
The defense might suggest that the Trump administration's focus on deregulation and economic growth has allowed states to take the lead on important social issues, empowering voters to express their opinions through ballot measures. The defense admits that while Trump’s presidency has been polarizing, it has also sparked a renewed interest in civic engagement.
Why Supporters Credit Him
Supporters might argue that the increased number of ballot measures is a sign of a healthy democracy, where citizens are actively participating in shaping their laws. The defense submits that this engagement is a direct response to the political climate, with voters eager to make their voices heard.
The Supporting Record
The defense might argue: The defense might point to the variety of topics covered in these measures, from LGBTQ rights to abortion and gun control, as evidence of a populace that is not only aware of but actively seeking to influence the issues that matter to them.
The Limitation or Competing Explanation
However, the defense might argue that while these measures are significant, they also reflect a fragmented political landscape, where states are taking matters into their own hands due to federal inaction.
Verdict
If this is Trump's fault, his supporters will gladly let him take the blame.
Defense exhibits
- Supporters' theory: The ballot measures reflect a vibrant democracy.
- Supporters' theory: Increased civic engagement is a response to the political climate.
- Supporters' theory: The variety of topics shows active participation in democracy.
Reality Check
Voters in dozens of states considered 146 statewide ballot measures this midterm cycle.
Satirical commentary based on the sourced facts above. Not a news report, campaign, or endorsement.
Connecting to the jury room…
Final verdict announced: November 6, 2026 at 5:03 AM ET
Step 2 · Personal verdict
Your verdict
Cast your verdict in the POLL above. Then predict the jury here.
No account required. One active verdict per browser; you can change it while voting is open.
Step 3 · Crowd prediction
Predict the jury
When this case closes, what percentage of readers will say “Trump’s fault”?
Step 4 · Reader verdict
Poll
All Responses
Live0 verified votes
Yes, it's Trump's fault
0%
No, it's not Trump's fault
0%
Too soon to tell
0%
- Your verdict
- —
- Your prediction
- —
Only 0 points away
100Accuracy score
Results are based on participating site visitors and are not a scientific poll.
Voting closed
Step 5 · Challenge your friends
Can you beat my prediction?
Your jury record
This browser
- Cases judged
- 0
- Average accuracy
- —
- Current streak
- 0
Opening Argument
The prosecution argues that the recent midterm elections, where voters considered 146 statewide ballot measures, are a direct reflection of the chaos unleashed by the Trump administration. The prosecution submits that these measures, spanning critical issues like LGBTQ rights and abortion, are symptomatic of a society in disarray, a society that Trump has left divided and confused.
Exhibit A: The Plausible Link
The prosecution alleges that the very existence of these ballot measures is a desperate attempt by states to counteract the harmful policies and rhetoric propagated during Trump's presidency. The prosecution imagines that each measure represents a community grappling with the fallout of Trump's divisive leadership.
The Domino Effect
In the prosecution's theory, the ripple effects of Trump's actions have led to increased polarization, resulting in a surge of ballot measures as states attempt to reclaim their autonomy.
The Hidden Danger
The prosecution urges that these measures, while seemingly progressive, could lead to unforeseen consequences, such as increased backlash from conservative factions emboldened by Trump's rhetoric. The prosecutor imagines a future where these measures ignite further conflict, leading to societal breakdown.
Closing Argument
The prosecution submits that the very act of voting on these measures is a testament to the damage done by Trump, a reflection of a nation struggling to find its identity amidst the wreckage.
Verdict
The prosecution alleges: The prosecution believes that the evidence is clear: Trump’s influence has led to a chaotic landscape where states are forced to take drastic measures to protect their citizens.
Prosecution exhibits
Reality Check
Voters in dozens of states considered 146 statewide ballot measures this midterm cycle.