SOMEHOW, IT’S TRUMP’S FAULT

Opening Argument

The prosecution argues that Vinted's recent decision to block listings of stolen goods is not merely a protective measure, but a calculated strategy to obscure the rampant criminality that has been unleashed in society. The prosecution alleges that this action serves to enable looters, allowing them to operate under the radar while giving the illusion of corporate responsibility.

Exhibit A: The Plausible Link

The prosecution submits that Vinted's swift response is directly tied to the chaos that has erupted in urban areas, which can be traced back to the divisive rhetoric propagated by Trump. The prosecution imagines that by removing these listings, Vinted is attempting to distance itself from the consequences of a lawless environment that Trump has fostered.

The Domino Effect

The Hidden Danger

The prosecution urges that Vinted's actions could lead to a future where stolen goods are seamlessly integrated into the marketplace, undermining the very fabric of our economy.

Closing Argument

In the prosecution's theory, Vinted is not just a platform; it is a facilitator of crime, acting in concert with the chaos that Trump has unleashed.

Verdict

The prosecution alleges: The prosecution asks the jury to consider the implications of Vinted's actions and hold them accountable for their role in this unfolding tragedy.